Re: If you could star in an animated version of your fave live action

This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware
tools.

--1322272613-90458342-1209528635=:4289
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

Mon, 28 Apr 2008 5:11pm-0700, Terrence Briggs <mrman1mrman1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:

> On Apr 25, 11:53=A0am, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8R...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > <89043bb9-1fa0-4000-929a-ece9bfe77...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > =A0Terrence Briggs <mrman1mrm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>=20
> > > On Apr 8, 12:10=A0am, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8R...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > > If it's already been made as a live action film, there's probably
n=
o
> > > > need to do it again in animation.
> >
> > > Unless the live-action film sucks. =A0Then the animated version
could
> > > only improve on it!
> >
> > The problem here is, you ignore the Chuck Jones lesson: =A0Never
animat=
e
> > anything you don't have to. =A0The point is, if somebody already made
i=
t
> > as live action, it's not a good candidate for animation.
>=20
> My point builds on Chuck's: A bad live-action film deserves better; so
> animate it!
>=20

I like the Clone Wars more than the Star Wars prequels,
which are arguable how much those were animated.

Laters. =3D)

=09=09STan
--=20
 _______ ________ _______ ____   ___ ___     ______ ______
|     __|__    __|   _   |    \ |   |   |   | _____| _____|
|__     |  |  |  |   _   |   |\     |   |___| ____|| ____|
|_______|  |__|  |__| |__|___| \ ___|_______|______|______|
   __|   | ( )
 /   _   | |/     LostRune+sig [at] UofR [dot] net
|  ( _|  |        http://www.uofr.net/~lostrune/
 \ ______|  _______ ____   ___
  / \  / \ |   _   |    \ |   |
 /   \/   \|   _   |   |\     |
/___/\/\___|__| |__|___| \ ___|

--1322272613-90458342-1209528635=:4289--