Re: If you could star in an animated version of your fave live action

On Apr 29, 9:45=A0am, "Patrick McNamara" <writerpatr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> "Terrence Briggs" <mrman1mrm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:b602cb44-4c88-45b9-ba00-9b32f0cc1588@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 25, 11:53 am, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8R...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > <89043bb9-1fa0-4000-929a-ece9bfe77...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > Terrence Briggs <mrman1mrm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >My point builds on Chuck's: A bad live-action film deserves better; so
> >animate it!
>
> Nowadays, there's really little difference between many live-action and
> animated films. There's so much CG mixed in with the live stuff that it
ca=
n
> be hard to tell if a film like Transformers shouldn't be considered
> live-action/animated.

Transformers isn't an animated film.  Only a ****tion of the sup****ting
characters are illustrated.  Isn't everything else shot on film?
Beowulf was more illustrated than that, even WITH the motion-capture
technology (re: the dragons, serpents, and projectiles).

> Of course just making a film animated doesn't make it better. It's still
> possible to do a bad animated film.

I reply to this in another post.

> Patrick McNamara
> E-mail: patjmcnam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Webpage:http://www.geocities.com/writerpatrick
> Podcast Ping podcast:http://podcastping.blogspot.com
> Torrentcast:http://www.mininova.org/rss.xml?user=3DPodcastPing

Terrence Briggs, loved ****a LeBouf's performance in Transformers.
Hated the giant robots, though :-)
Peace to you...